Skip to content
Delete Learn

1.2 Your Attachment Style

Why do you keep texting them even when they take 3 days to reply? Or why do you feel suffocated the moment someone gets too close? It’s not random. It’s your attachment style — and it’s probably the most predictive factor in how your relationships will go.

What Is Attachment Theory?

Attachment theory is the most validated framework we have for understanding relationship patterns. Developed by psychiatrist John Bowlby in the 1960s, it proposes that our early experiences with caregivers create “internal working models” — mental templates that guide how we approach relationships throughout life.[1]

Mary Ainsworth’s “Strange Situation” studies in 1978 identified distinct patterns in how infants responded to separation from caregivers.[2] In 1987, Hazan and Shaver made the breakthrough connection: these same patterns appear in adult romantic relationships.[3]

Their foundational research showed that attachment styles established in infancy persist into adulthood, shaping how we experience love, handle conflict, and respond to intimacy.

The Four Attachment Styles

Secure (50-65% of people)

  • Comfortable with intimacy and independence
  • Can communicate needs without drama
  • Don’t play games or test partners
  • Trust comes naturally (but isn’t blind)
  • View relationships as safe, partners as dependable

Anxious (5-20% of people)

  • Fear of abandonment runs deep
  • Hypervigilant to partner’s moods and texts
  • Need reassurance, sometimes too much
  • When things are good, you’re great. When uncertain, you spiral.
  • Use “hyperactivating strategies” — constant vigilance for relationship threats[4]

Avoidant (20-25% of people)

  • Discomfort with emotional closeness
  • Value independence above connection
  • Shut down when things get intense
  • Partners often feel like they’re “chasing” you
  • Use “deactivating strategies” — suppressing attachment needs[4]

Disorganized/Fearful-Avoidant (5-10% of people)

  • Mix of anxious and avoidant, often switching between them
  • Relationships feel chaotic
  • Usually stems from early trauma or inconsistent caregiving
  • Want closeness but fear it simultaneously
  • fMRI studies show altered amygdala and prefrontal cortex activity[5]

Note: Prevalence percentages vary across studies and cultures. The U.S. National Comorbidity Survey found 63.5% secure, 22.2% avoidant, and 5.5% anxious in a sample of 5,645 adults.[6]

The Neuroscience of Attachment

Attachment isn’t just psychology — it’s biology. A comprehensive 2017 review of attachment neuroscience revealed:[7]

Secure attachment is associated with:

  • Greater activation of oxytocin (bonding) and dopamine (reward) circuits
  • Tighter integration between reward and affiliation brain systems
  • More effective stress regulation via the HPA axis

Insecure attachment is associated with:

  • Lower oxytocin levels and altered amygdala structure/function
  • In avoidant attachment: greater nigrostriatal dopamine activation (action-oriented rather than bonding-oriented)
  • In anxious attachment: heightened amygdala reactivity to social cues

The key insight: Attachment patterns are encoded in neural circuitry. They’re not character flaws — they’re learned adaptations that became wired into your brain during development.

The Anxious-Avoidant Trap

This is the most common pattern therapists see — and the most painful.

The anxious partner pursues connection. This triggers the avoidant partner’s fear of engulfment. The avoidant partner withdraws. This triggers the anxious partner’s fear of abandonment. Repeat indefinitely.

Research shows this pairing persists despite mutual dissatisfaction because the emotional dynamics feel familiar to both partners — each unconsciously seeks to recreate (and hopefully resolve) unmet childhood emotional needs.[8]

According to John Gottman’s research, couples stuck in pursuer-distancer cycles have significantly higher rates of early divorce. These pairings are often “unsatisfactory yet stable” — partners remain bound by matching internal working models despite unhappiness.

Why it happens: Anxious people are drawn to avoidants because the uncertainty triggers their attachment system. Avoidants are drawn to anxious people because the pursuit feels like validation without requiring vulnerability.

Why it’s a trap: Neither gets what they need. The anxious person never feels secure. The avoidant person never gets space. Both blame the other instead of recognizing the system.

Can Attachment Change?

This is the hopeful part. Research consistently shows attachment is not fixed.

A 6-year longitudinal study found:[9]

  • Secure individuals showed highest stability (66% remained secure)
  • 28% of fearful-avoidant individuals became secure by the follow-up
  • 39% of dismissive-avoidant individuals became secure
  • Increases in security were predicted by positive life events and reduced stress
  • Increases in insecurity were predicted by depression, hostile affect, and environmental stress

A 2019 review of longitudinal research concluded: “Early experiences do NOT determine adult outcomes — attachment can change.”[10] Attachment styles are more malleable in childhood and adolescence, but change remains possible throughout life.

What drives change:

  • A relationship with a securely attached partner
  • Therapy (especially attachment-focused approaches)
  • Significant positive life experiences
  • Self-awareness and intentional work

This is called “earned secure” attachment — people who had insecure early experiences but developed security through later relationships or therapeutic work.

Attachment Predicts Relationship Outcomes

A 2019 meta-analysis examined how attachment affects both your own and your partner’s relationship satisfaction:[11]

  • Both anxiety and avoidance negatively correlate with relationship satisfaction
  • Avoidance has a larger negative effect than anxiety
  • Your attachment style affects your partner’s satisfaction too (not just your own)

Another meta-analysis found that the negative effects of insecure attachment on relationships get worse over time — attachment effects compound in longer relationships.[12]

A 15-year longitudinal study found that attachment security predicted greater marital satisfaction, though the relationship to divorce was mediated through satisfaction rather than direct.[13]

The research is clear: attachment style is one of the strongest predictors of relationship quality we have.

Quick Self-Assessment

Answer honestly:

When my partner doesn’t text back quickly, I…

  • A) Assume they’re busy and go about my day (Secure)
  • B) Check my phone repeatedly, analyze their last message (Anxious)
  • C) Feel relieved I have some space (Avoidant)
  • D) Swing between panic and anger (Disorganized)

When a relationship gets serious, I tend to…

  • A) Feel excited and lean in (Secure)
  • B) Worry they’ll leave once they really know me (Anxious)
  • C) Feel trapped and need distance (Avoidant)
  • D) Want to run but also can’t let go (Disorganized)

After a fight, I usually…

  • A) Want to talk it through and repair (Secure)
  • B) Seek reassurance that we’re okay (Anxious)
  • C) Need space before I can discuss (Avoidant)
  • D) Feel confused about what I even want (Disorganized)

For a validated assessment, the Experiences in Close Relationships (ECR) scale measures attachment on two dimensions: anxiety and avoidance.[14]

Examples

Meera (Anxious) checks Rahul’s “last seen” status 20 times a day. When he’s slow to reply, she drafts responses, deletes them, worries she said something wrong. When they’re together, she’s happy. When apart, her hyperactivating strategies kick in — constant vigilance for signs of rejection. She knows it’s “too much” but can’t stop. Her attachment system is doing exactly what it learned to do.

Vikram (Avoidant) starts strong in relationships — attentive, present, engaged. But around the 2-3 month mark, he needs “space.” Partners feel him pulling away. He’s not being dishonest — closeness genuinely triggers his deactivating strategies. His brain learned early that independence equals safety.

Ananya (Secure) had an anxious ex and an avoidant ex. With the anxious one, she reassured but didn’t enable. With the avoidant one, she gave space but maintained her standards. Neither worked, but she didn’t lose herself in either. Her secure base let her engage without being consumed.

Karan (Earned Secure) had a chaotic childhood — unpredictable caregivers, no consistent safety. In his 20s, he was textbook disorganized: wanting closeness, fearing it, cycling between anxious and avoidant. Three years of therapy and a patient partner later, he’s functionally secure. Change is possible.

Cross-Cultural Perspective

Attachment theory was developed in Western contexts, but research shows secure attachment is a universal norm across cultures — most children everywhere develop secure attachments when caregiving is consistent.[15]

However, the distribution of insecure styles varies by cultural context. Collectivist cultures may show different patterns than individualist ones. Mexican American children show higher rates of anxious attachment, while African Americans show higher rates of avoidant attachment — likely reflecting different socialization practices rather than innate differences.

The core principle holds: responsive, consistent caregiving produces secure attachment across all cultures studied.

Reflection

  • Which style resonated most with you?
  • Think about your last 2-3 relationships. Do you see a pattern?
  • Have partners ever said things like “you’re too needy” or “you’re emotionally unavailable”?
  • If you’re insecure, what’s one thing you could do differently knowing your pattern?

One Thing to Know

Your attachment style isn’t a life sentence. It’s a starting point.

Research shows that with awareness, the right relationship, and sometimes professional help, insecure attachment can shift toward secure. The neural pathways that encode attachment were shaped by experience — and they can be reshaped by new experiences.

The first step is just knowing what you’re working with. The anxious person who recognizes their hyperactivation can pause before the third text. The avoidant person who understands their deactivation can stay in the room instead of leaving. Awareness creates choice.

You didn’t choose your attachment style. You can choose what you do with it.

References

  1. Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York: Basic Books. AbeBooks

  2. Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of Attachment: A Psychological Study of the Strange Situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. doi:10.4324/9780203758045

  3. Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511-524. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511

  4. Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2003). The attachment behavioral system in adulthood: Activation, psychodynamics, and interpersonal processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 53-152. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(03)01002-5

  5. Neurobiology of Disorganized Attachment: A Review. (2023). Neuroscience Insights. PMC9947683

  6. U.S. National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R). Attachment prevalence data from 5,645 adults. PubMed

  7. Feldman, R. (2017). The neurobiology of human attachments. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(2), 80-99. Full PDF

  8. The Attachment Dynamic: Dyadic Patterns of Anxiety and Avoidance. (2021). Personal Relationships. PMC8336265

  9. Stability and Fluctuation in Adult Attachment Style Over a 6-Year Period. (2005). Journal of Research in Personality. PubMed

  10. Fraley, R. C., & Roisman, G. I. (2019). The development of adult attachment styles: Four lessons. Current Opinion in Psychology, 25, 26-30. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.02.005

  11. Candel, O. S., & Turliuc, M. N. (2019). Insecure attachment and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 147, 190-199. ScienceDirect

  12. Hadden, B. W., Smith, C. V., & Webster, G. D. (2014). Temporal Adult Romantic Attachment (TARA) Model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18(1), 42-58. PubMed

  13. Attachment, Marital Satisfaction, and Divorce During the First Fifteen Years of Parenthood. (2011). Personal Relationships. PMC3061469

  14. Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult romantic attachment: An integrative overview. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46-76). New York: Guilford Press. ECR Scale

  15. Agishtein, P., & Brumbaugh, C. (2013). Cultural variation in adult attachment. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 7(4), 384-405. ResearchGate

Next up: How You Handle Conflict — fight, flight, freeze, or fawn?